COMMENTS
My children's pediatrician says she is not concerned due to where we live (North Georgia)... she thinks there is enough sunlight exposure. She says she'd say differently if we lived farther north. She is generally very hands-off about recommending things routinely.
Mercola.com has recently put out a response to new research on the Vit. D. subject which I find very interesting. (Hopefully I don't get UVA and UVB mixed up... but here's how I remember it) UVA rays are what provoke the body to make Vitamin D, while UVB rays actually reverse this, or can cause a Vit. D deficiency. It takes a while (24-48hrs?) for the body to actually respond to the UVA trigger to make Vit D, while at the same time, the Vit. D, which is made on the skin, can actually be washed away before even being absorbed into the body. Therefore, for those of us trying to rely on natural sunlight for our Vit D levels, if we resort to taking a bath or shower within a day or two of sun exposure, lathering our bodies up, our Vit D will be washed right down the drain. Also, getting sunlight through windows/glass/sunscreen blocks the UVA rays, leaving only the effects of the UVB rays, which deplete our bodies of Vit D.
With all this in mind, we need to remember that Vit D cannot get into our breastmilk if it is not in our bodies to begin with. For some, maybe supplementation is the answer. Maybe we shouldn't be washing with soap every day (at least not our whole body, esp.not the sun exposed parts; how dirty do they really get?... ). And maybe we just really need to remember to get some good quality natural sunlight every day. After all, the sunshine vitamin is a great mood enhancer and natural anti-depressant, something all moms need from time to time!
Hope this helps... ;)
Urg...so frustrating! I keep reading this stuff regarding vitamins, Vit D, etc and our doc never ever said that any of this was necessary! So frustrating!! She said don't worry about vitamins until she's 2! So here I am not worrying and assuming she's getting enough from my BM. Sigh. I just hope I haven't "ruined" her yet. Man, why can't everyone get on the same page?! ACK!!
I actually have a lot to say about vitamin D- as a LLL leader I was very surprised to see that LLL now recommends babies receive the 400 IU daily - I actually just attended a seminar put on by a local physician about Vitamin D and I'm now convinced more than ever that vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency are something to take very serious in babies, children and adults.
and to correct an earlier comment - your body needs UVB rays to synthesize the vitamin D - not UVA rays.
here are some good sites to look to for research:
www.vitamindrevolution.com
also one thing that has provoked more thought in my head than anything else was a graph showing the increased rate of melanoma since the sunblock movement started. Yes - there are fewer cases of squamous and basal cell carcinoma - the ones that rarely are fatal, but the rate of melanoma has risen incredibly. One cannot deny that there is a highly probably link to our deficiency in vitamin D and the increased rate of melanoma.
There are vitamin D receptors all over the body - and research is now showing that this hormone benefits us in so many ways.
Deficiency is considered a level less than 20 -but the normal range is considered between 20-100.
However the optimal range is 40-60 - this is where the most beneficial response in the body happens.
So one can be "normal" at 25 and really be insufficient.
What I advocate is for moms to have their levels tested - especially if they live above the 35th parallel (kentucky). I also think if there's a question that children should also be tested. People who have darker skin are at a greater risk of deficiency, as are people who are obsese.
One question a lot of people have is about toxicity levels but from the research I've seen you would have to take an extreme amount >50,000IU a week for a long period of time - for this to occur.
http://vitamindcouncil.org
btw - I live in Niceville, FL (panhandle, NW florida)
Yes... I did get UVA and UVB mixed up. UVB kick in the Vit D production, and are blocked by glass, leaving UVA ray exposure with indoor light.
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/05/12/Shocking-Update-Sunshine-Can-Actually-Decrease-Your-Vitamin-D-Levels.aspx
This is mercola's response. Great info, I suggest checking it out.
Sorry if I confused anyone!
Jen
These comments are really fabulous. Thanks to Jen and Anne for the great resources. I had no idea about the UVA and UVB as they pertain to vitamin D. Nor did i know that LLL is recommending vitamin D.
Debbie
Couple of points that I need to understand:
1. Doesnot melanin protect against skin cancers. That's why, in the equatorial regions and subequatorial regions, where sunlight is strong, people have more melanin in the skin and do not have as many cases of skin cancer. Removing it to become fairer in the presence of UVA is the problem as I see it re cancer.
2. How long does the vitamin D on skin last before it is absorbed. If one works in the sun for hours together (as in the regions I described - women farmers, etc.), then surely some vitamin D will get into the body even if they bathe, as they work from about 8am to 4 pm in the sun. Will bathing make too much of a difference to them?
3. In India, several of the poorer babies are left in the shade of the sun, with very few clothes on. They rarely get skin cancer, and am sure they get plenty of vitamin D.
4. Before any universal panacea is recommended for vitamin D deficiency, it would be good to test different populations from different regions. I am sure even in India, the children of the rich who sit in AC comfort, move around in cars, and apply fairness creams would have deficiency, but not those who access the public health system.
5. I think we also need to see this in the context of reducing food to micronutrients, so that natural food becomes inferior to fortified foods, capsules and pills as supplements, etc., which have to be commercially produced. and what better way to earn profits than getting the WHO to accept it as essential and put it into a country's public health system?
Breast milk IS perfect, but if a mother's diet is Vitamin D deficient, then her milk would be, too. For me, the benefit of the vitamin supplements is worth it. However, my doctor seemed quite relaxed about it and did not mention it until my daughter was two months old . . . and in fact I believe the protocol was to start babies at the age of one month. So she started a little late, and I actually stopped giving them to her when she started eating 1/4 cup of rice cereal a day, which was at 6 months or so.
There is no vitamin D in rice cereal.
Straight from Gerber's website:
GERBER Single Grain Cereals – Rice
Nutrition Facts
Serv. Size ¼ cup (15g)
Servings Per Container About 15
Amount Per Serving
Calories 60
Total Fat: 0.5g
Trans Fat: 0g
Sodium: 0mg
Potassium: 20mg
Total Carbohydrates: 12g
Dietary Fiber: 0g
Sugar: 1g
Protein: 1g
%Daily Value
Infants 0-1 Children 1-4
Protein: 5% 5%
Vitamin A: 0% 0%
Vitamin C: 0% 0%
Calcium: 15% 10%
Iron: 45% 60%
Vitamin E: 15% 8%
Thiamin: 25% 15%
Riboflavin: 25% 20%
Niacin: 25% 20%
Vitamin B6: 25% 10%
Folate: 25% 10%
Vitamin B12: 25% 15%
Phosphorus: 10% 6%
Zinc: 20% 10%
Ingredients
RICE FLOUR, SOY OIL-LECITHIN, TRI– AND DICALCIUM PHOSPHATE, MIXED TOCOPHEROLS (TO PRESERVE FRESHNESS), ELECTROLYTIC IRON, ZINC SULFATE, ALPHA TOCOPHERYL ACETATE (VITAMIN E), NIACINAMIDE (A B VITAMIN), RIBOFLAVIN (VITAMIN B2), PYRIDOXINE HYDROCHLORIDE (VITAMIN B6), THIAMIN MONONITRATE (VITAMIN B1), FOLIC ACID (A B VITAMIN),VITAMIN B12 (CYANOCOBALAMIN)
There is no vitamin D in Gerber oatmeal, barley, or whole wheat cereals.
In fact there is hardly any nutrition at all.
I should have clarified that I did know baby cereals do not contain Vitamin D. I simply made the choice to discontinue her vitamin supplement drops when she started cereal. I've always been a big milk drinker and for whatever reason, my daughter never seemed to have any issues from not taking the drops. She did have blood work done at 15 months of age and everything was normal (although she had been on Vitamin D fortified cow's milk for three months at that point). I'm expecting again and haven't fully decided how long I will keep the new baby on drops, but I do think I will talk to my pediatrician about starting them earlier.
Just some more food for thought: I'll bet anything that therapies such as dry skin brushing and massage actually stimulate and increase absorption of Vitamin D. Dry skin brushing has even been listed as a natural way to fight cancer, not just skin cancer, and benefits the immune system overall. Maybe one of the reasons this is is that it does indeed increase the amount of Vit D that makes it into the body...
Just thinking outloud, would love it if anyone knows for sure!
Pregnant women need to be taking at least 2000 IU per day to make sure their vitamin D stores are adequate. They have even had some mothers take up to 4000 IU per day but this is still being evaluated. When mothers are not deficient before birth then the babies will have plenty. I will have to look up the links.
Our pediatrician recommended 400 IU vitamin D at our very first visit with our newborn (on day 6). This is standard for her practice, which has about 5 pediatricians. We live in the San Francisco Bay Area--outside the foggy area.
Wow, I never knew that Blogging for Babies. That's pretty interesting...
I was just thinking about Breastfeeding and Mothers and you've really helped out. Thanks!
That's great, I never thought about Blogging for Babies, Breastfeeding and Motherslike that before.