
A recent article in The Atlantic, by Hanna Rosin, entitled "The Case Against Breastfeeding", unfortunately misrepresented the recent evidence surrounding the benefits of breastfeeding. In her effort to perhaps soften the blows often felt by formula feeding mothers, Ms. Rosin simply ignored the truth behind breastfeeding research.
It is true that many women have difficulty achieving the optimal breastfeeding goals. Many women that choose formula feeding often feel guilty about not breastfeeding. Ms. Rosin was later interviewed on The Today Show where she stated that she is not actually against breastfeeding. However, articles such as these do great harm to the promotion of breastfeeding as a major health concern for both women and children.
The US Breastfeeding Committee, in their statement against Ms. Rosin's article, stated "a mother provides individually customized breast milk designed to enhance her child's immunologic, developmental, and nutritional status. This is not the same as processed formula, in which the contents of every can are identical. We perform a disservice to American families by perpetuating the myth that feeding human infants artificially created formula is equivalent to breastfeeding."
The Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine also issued a statement in response to Ms. Rosin's article. According to Ruth Lawrence, MD, Editor-in-Chief of Breastfeeding Medicine, from the Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, "The Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine encourages all women to make an informed choice when faced with the question of how to feed their infants based on strong, well-referenced scientific information. The data are compelling, scientific, and reinforced constantly. Breastfeeding for the new mother may not always be easy, but it is important and rewarding for both mother and infant."